-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EPIPE write, ECONNRESET issues when switch to nodejs 20 #177
Comments
Oooh, that sounds very interesting! I haven't seen this before myself, and Mockttp's own tests seem to run fine in 20.16.0 so I'm not sure exactly what would cause this. Is there any pattern to which tests fail? Is there anything notable about those tests? If you try using other Node versions (older Node v20 versions, or Node v22) do those fail in the same way? If not, it would be really interesting to try a few different versions and see if you can work out exactly which version is breaking this for you. |
Hi @pimterry, Indeed a very interesting issue it is 🙂 Regarding your questions:
I tried version 20.0.0 and it is not working right away, so seems that the issue is appearing from very beginning of the node 20 version. I also tried 22.6.0 and it fails the tests in the same way. And again the latest 18.x version fixes everything immediately. I also use the latest to date
There are two patterns usually:
expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality
- Expected - 3
+ Received + 7
Object {
"details": Object {
- "messages": Array [],
- "returnCode": 0,
+ "connectionCode": "ECONNRESET",
+ "httpStatusCode": undefined,
+ "messages": Array [
+ "read ECONNRESET",
+ ],
},
- "status": "OK",
+ "status": "ERROR",
+ "type": "CONNECTION_ERROR",
}
10244 | )(packageName)(packageOptions);
10245 | // assert
> 10246 | expect(createPackageResult).toEqual({
| ^
10247 | status: ResponseStatus.OK,
10248 | details: {
10249 | returnCode: 0, These tests usually use await mockServer.forAnyRequest().thenJson(
200,
{
data: [],
messages,
reports: {},
returnCode,
},
{
version: '2.5',
'content-type': 'application/json',
}
);
expect(received).toBe(expected) // Object.is equality
Expected: true
Received: false
6726 | const seenRequests = await endevorEndpoint.getSeenRequests();
6727 | const calledOnce = seenRequests.length === 1;
> 6728 | expect(calledOnce).toBe(true);
| ^
6729 |
6730 | expect(isErrorEndevorResponse(generateResult)).toBe(false);
6731 | }); This one happens usually with the |
Ok, that's very useful thanks. I think it's likely that this is a Node bug (or intentional breaking change that's causing issues), but unfortunately I'm also a Node maintainer, so I can't really pass the buck here 😆, and whether the fix is in Node or Mockttp it'd be useful to know exactly what's going on. Can you share more detail about how exactly are you're sending the requests, and any kinds of client configuration there? One thing that has changed a few times in Node during major version bumps is a slow tightening of which kinds of subtly invalid connections or unusual requests are accepted, so it might be that there's something unusual there triggering this. If you test with some v19 versions, does this fail the same way there too? If we can pin this down to a specific version where it breaks then that would reduce the set of possibly related changes in Node significantly, which would be very helpful to understand the issue. Is there any chance you can put together a reproduction of the issue, or share enough code that I can run the tests myself? That would make it very dramatically easier to investigate and fix. |
Hello,
After the migration to nodejs 20.16.0 from 18.20.4 some of our tests that use Mockttp server started to fail with
EPIPE write
orECONNRESET read
orECONNRESET socket hang up
errors. We have around 200 tests in general and only some of them are affected. A weird part is that if to run failed tests individually they are passing, which makes me think that it may be related to some parallel running issues or race conditions. We use Jest as a test runner.Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: