Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small feature? request #78

Open
jpobeda opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Small feature? request #78

jpobeda opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@jpobeda
Copy link

jpobeda commented May 1, 2017

Hi Howie,

When we pick data sources from the webeditor and we tick the "Append TARGET" we can aggregate TARGETs (don't know if there is a max, I wonder what would happen with multiple snmp queries). So let's say we are appending 4 targets then the latst one is the one ending as OVERLIBGRAPH (only 1 and the last you added).

The whole thing is, I normally put 2 targets, sometimes more, but when I only put 2 I normally display both with OVERLIBGRAPH. I don't do that for more than 2 graphs because it becomes really ugly from the map point of view and from the config point of view because the OVERLIBGRAPH becomes terrible long as well (I've been thinking a nice way to mask it but...nothing useful yet).

So the question, is it possible to have a checkbox to add them to OVERLIBGRAPH as well?

I know you'd say if it's only to add a second one why should you bother? hahaha

It's stricky because you know 2 will be ok but more will be messy BUT at the same time, doing 2 on multiple links is a pain in the ... because you'll have to find out what the graph_id is separately while nwm already knows that from the picker.

So I think the real question is, how can nwm help us to address this issue?

If you want this on cacti's forum to see what other users think, let me know. I thought I'd be better here.

@howardjones
Copy link
Owner

OK... this is a reasonable request - I'm just trying to think if there was a better way to do it than adding more (rarely used) checkboxes to the small picker window. Like maybe a settings tab on the picker, for all these little tweaks. I want to replace the picker completely quite soon, with something that can understand more than just a Cacti database, also.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants