-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Developing a entry point/index for OSM Analytics projects #85
Comments
@brendangatens I think we should/could do an "above the fold" grouping of Core Projects and then Additional Work following, as second priority. This is exactly how you have it organized here and I wouldn't second guess it? For this initial MVP, I would put the tools marked as HIGH priority in the OSMA Ecosystem spreadsheet as are the core projects. RE: tagging -- next week @cgiovando and I will put together a series of themes. The way I was imaging it, all projects -- core or not -- would have a tag(s). I was thinking of a lot of blog formats, including the Medium screenshot below. I would like to see a little less real estate to these themes below the core projects (perhaps shorten the height here) and add a section about supporting the work. There are 2 key pieces to that support/involvement-- 1) "join the community" as a developer and/or users and 2) contribute money. The first could have a link to the slack channel and a general GitHub and contact email the latter a (perhaps) an email address to keep in touch. I see this as really critical to the ongoing development of these projects. They are sustained by us, but also the community in more ways than one. In the initial Language Document I wrote this to support the work. I would recommend we work on this language but it's general point is still valid:
Note: this was inspired by other OS projects, including PostGIS. Hope this is helpful. |
Proposal of data store architecture:
The YAML would look like this:
Software stack proposal:
|
Goal of the idea
Create a site that serves as an entry point to OSM analytics tools from various organizations.
Initial proposal
List of tools
Initial proposed direction
Considering the intial list of tools has grown, could we give primary treatment (called Core analytics tools below) to the most relevant tools, and give secondary treatment to all other tools?
There has been some discussion on categorizing or tagging tools based on purpose, action, and organization. We discussed having more granular filters on a Tools page.
We're also looking at ways to highlight the organizations and individuals who are contributing to these tools, while finding ways to better call out information on how people (developers) can become contributors, and point out / link to contribution details for individual tools.
Homepage
Menu
Tools page
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: