You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for publishing these solutions, it has helped me understanding the material better.
I have a question about I.5.11, in the first part you do not use the definition of $\sim$ and do not show $\pi^A_{\sim_A}\pi_A$ is an morphism that satisfies the quotient condition, is this implicit?
Then in the second part I do not see how $1_A$ would satisfy the quotient condition $A/{\sim_A}$ since that only seems to work if $\sim_A = I_A$ (the identity relation). What am I missing here?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for publishing these solutions, it has helped me understanding the material better.
I have a question about I.5.11, in the first part you do not use the definition of$\sim$ and do not show $\pi^A_{\sim_A}\pi_A$ is an morphism that satisfies the quotient condition, is this implicit?
Then in the second part I do not see how$1_A$ would satisfy the quotient condition $A/{\sim_A}$ since that only seems to work if $\sim_A = I_A$ (the identity relation). What am I missing here?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: