-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zome re-structure mirco-service architecture #4
Comments
I think actually we'll need them all in one zome in order to enable validation that ties everything together. The direction I'm taking this project is one in which you can specify some verifiable aggregation of the various resources in a customisable manor. For example, I imagine might do something like this for producing verifiable winnings-coupon contexts for signing:
|
Rather than splitting everything into zomes, it might still be useful to split them into crates. That would allow other projects to more conveniently include functionality in a partial manor. |
I would say in general zomes are at the crate level of granularity and have their own cargo file.. right now you have four independent features bundled under one zome called username_registry.. Its fine for a repo to maintain multiple zomes which can be later pulled in as independent crates to other projects. |
Could you give me an example of how this would work? I was under the impression (perhaps mistakenly?) that when calling Let's say I want to validate a |
Deprioritised |
Spike for establishing pattern to make features modular: |
currently there is only one zome for the functionality of four distinct parts which could be split into four zomes:
this would make documentation clearer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: