You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently Recipes define trust via a simple whitelist. The issue here is that trust is not binary, and recipe would be better off specifying the capacities in which they trust each author. E.g. "I trust author X with documents named championship/some_fixed_id/match/*", or "I trust author Y with external ID attestations referencing platform A".
It might also be useful to move the trust list on to a separate entity, making it possible to execute the same recipe against different authors in order to compare the outcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently
Recipe
s define trust via a simple whitelist. The issue here is that trust is not binary, and recipe would be better off specifying the capacities in which they trust each author. E.g. "I trust author X with documents namedchampionship/some_fixed_id/match/*
", or "I trust author Y with external ID attestations referencing platform A".It might also be useful to move the trust list on to a separate entity, making it possible to execute the same recipe against different authors in order to compare the outcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: