Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect EPT.JSON bounds for SD_Southwest_B2_2018? #61

Open
bkgelder opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Incorrect EPT.JSON bounds for SD_Southwest_B2_2018? #61

bkgelder opened this issue Jun 14, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@bkgelder
Copy link

I am experiencing failures downloading workunit_id 79125 in South Dakota via EPT using a PDAL pipeline. It appears that at least the EPT bounds listed in the JSON are incorrect, as when I plot them it only covers a small fraction of the boundary shown in the WESM geopackage.

Here is a copy of the pipeline I am using that returns 0 points:

{
"pipeline": [
{
"bounds": "([-11386571.4549, -11370238.3078], [5310909.450199999, 5314697.409899998])",
"filename": "https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usgs-lidar-public/SD_Southwest_B2_2018/ept.json",
"type": "readers.ept",
"tag": "readdata"
},
{
"out_srs": "EPSG:26913",
"tag": "reprojectUTM",
"type": "filters.reprojection"
},
{
"filename": "D:/DEP_Proc/DEMProc/LAS_dem2013_3m_101402030101/ept_101402030101_79125.las",
"tag": "writerslas",
"type": "writers.las"
}]}

@keythread
Copy link

I'm in the process of transferring an update to the original project that should now match the WESM boundaries. The original dataset was missing a large chunk of data within the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. I'll update this issue when the transfer is complete (should be in the next 24-48 hours).

@keythread
Copy link

Data updates have been transferred. Please test again. The data coverage now reflects the entirety of the WESM boundaries now:
SD_Southwest_B2_2018_updated

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants