We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
C-H
H-C
It should be a pairwise combination:
M1CA-M1HA 55.12 4.55 M1CE-M1HE 17.25 1.72 Q2CA-Q2HA 54.9 5.27 I3CA-I3HA 59.5 4.21 I3CB-I3HB 42.4 1.77 I3CG2-I3HG2 18.1 0.66 I3CD1-I3HD1 14.3 0.61
Whilst now its doing an all-vs-all combination
S1C-S1H 172.29 8.44 S1C-S1HB2 172.29 3.87 S1C-S1HB3 172.29 3.90 S1CA-S1H 57.16 8.44 S1CA-S1HB2 57.16 3.87 S1CA-S1HB3 57.16 3.90 S1CB-S1H 63.03 8.44
This is implied by the atom notation of CX-HX, we then need a new definition in the catalog for this type of combination.
CX-HX
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rvhonorato
No branches or pull requests
It should be a pairwise combination:
Whilst now its doing an all-vs-all combination
This is implied by the atom notation of
CX-HX
, we then need a new definition in the catalog for this type of combination.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: