Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Redistribute for MultiField #140

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023
Merged

Redistribute for MultiField #140

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 7, 2023

Conversation

JordiManyer
Copy link
Member

@JordiManyer JordiManyer commented Dec 7, 2023

Redistribution for MultiFieldFESpaces...
The current implementation loops through the different FESpaces, so it's definitely not the best. I believe the most efficient way of tackling this in general is to redistribute information dof-wise, not cell-wise. But this will come later...

@JordiManyer JordiManyer self-assigned this Dec 7, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 7, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 62 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0bfb7c6) 0.00% compared to head (f736a0a) 0.00%.

Files Patch % Lines
src/Adaptivity.jl 0.00% 60 Missing ⚠️
src/MultiField.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #140   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files          12      12           
  Lines        2470    2518   +48     
======================================
- Misses       2470    2518   +48     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@JordiManyer JordiManyer merged commit b30c808 into master Dec 7, 2023
3 checks passed
@JordiManyer JordiManyer deleted the redistribute-multifield branch December 7, 2023 06:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants