You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2018. It is now read-only.
I implemented a soft "no tips" option as part of #114. But for reasons first articulated on #80, we need to implement a hard option. The difference between soft and hard here is that for the soft option we still move money, the person just states an intention to regift, whereas for the hard option we wouldn't actually move any money to the person.
The two reasons we need this are:
We want to avoid burdening people who want to give and not receive on Gittip with the busy work of making sure their gifts out exceed their gifts in.
We need to let people pick arbitrary participant_ids, and we want to support the case where someone wants to claim their username in order to prevent tips to it. Actually, in that case we should probably require that the name be active on one of the social networks. Hmm ...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I implemented a soft "no tips" option as part of #114. But for reasons first articulated on #80, we need to implement a hard option. The difference between soft and hard here is that for the soft option we still move money, the person just states an intention to regift, whereas for the hard option we wouldn't actually move any money to the person.
The two reasons we need this are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: