Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow multiple JSON RPC providers for the same network #30

Open
tilacog opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Allow multiple JSON RPC providers for the same network #30

tilacog opened this issue May 10, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
@tilacog
Labels
feature New feature or request high-priority Should be given priority
Milestone
Robustness

Comments

@tilacog
Copy link
Contributor

tilacog commented May 10, 2022

Currently, networks can only be configured by having a single JSON RPC provider.

For robustness, it would be ideal if we could configure multiple providers for the same network, just like graph-node does.

Therefore, if the Block Oracle would try the following provider in case the previous was unresponsive or behaved in an unpredictable manner.
@tilacog tilacog self-assigned this May 11, 2022
@neysofu neysofu added high-priority Should be given priority low-priority Doesn't impact normal operations and removed high-priority Should be given priority labels Jul 26, 2022
@tilacog tilacog moved this to 📒 Todo in Indexer Apr 27, 2023
@tilacog tilacog added this to Indexer Apr 27, 2023
@tilacog tilacog added feature New feature or request and removed low-priority Doesn't impact normal operations labels Apr 27, 2023
@tilacog tilacog added this to the Robustness milestone Aug 29, 2023
@fordN fordN moved this from 📒 Todo to 🙏 Feature Requests in Indexer Sep 20, 2023
@fordN fordN added the high-priority Should be given priority label Sep 25, 2023
@matthewdarwin
Copy link

I think this is not a high priority. Indexers can run proxyd and have multiple providers behind that.

That is graph-node->proxyd->rpc

@azf20
Copy link
Contributor

azf20 commented Oct 9, 2023

@matthewdarwin this is an issue for the block-oracle repository. I agree that the block oracle could leverage a proxy as you describe, @fordN @tilacog can you provide any more recent context on this requirement?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tilacog tilacog

Labels
feature New feature or request high-priority Should be given priority
Projects
Indexer
Status: 🙏 Feature Requests
Milestone
Robustness
Development

No branches or pull requests
5 participants
@fordN @tilacog @azf20 @neysofu @matthewdarwin