We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I decided to try and give this a shot but my testing shows that this is only marginally faster than the standard lib and much slower than gojay.
goos: darwin goarch: arm64 pkg: json_sample_project BenchmarkGoJay-8 183072 5527 ns/op 735 B/op 4 allocs/op BenchmarkGoJay-8 216786 5524 ns/op 736 B/op 4 allocs/op BenchmarkGoJay-8 218978 5531 ns/op 736 B/op 4 allocs/op BenchmarkGoJson-8 94362 12716 ns/op 1486 B/op 10 allocs/op BenchmarkGoJson-8 94453 12656 ns/op 1480 B/op 10 allocs/op BenchmarkGoJson-8 94714 12712 ns/op 1484 B/op 10 allocs/op BenchmarkStdJson-8 72688 16376 ns/op 1228 B/op 10 allocs/op BenchmarkStdJson-8 73118 16341 ns/op 1226 B/op 10 allocs/op BenchmarkStdJson-8 73194 16342 ns/op 1226 B/op 10 allocs/op PASS ok json_sample_project 12.847s
I zipped up the sample projected used to generate the tests
json_sample_project.zip
Not sure if the posted results stand true anymore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I decided to try and give this a shot but my testing shows that this is only marginally faster than the standard lib and much slower than gojay.
I zipped up the sample projected used to generate the tests
json_sample_project.zip
Not sure if the posted results stand true anymore.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: