Making 3D velocity models #548
Ali1990dashti
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I don't fully get it. You have a 2D profile of sensors, but you do a 3D synthetic model computation (why?). Finally you invert the data 2D as this is the default if you don't specify a mesh. By default, the mesh depth is derived from the shot-geophone distance and 22m is probably deep enough. I don't think that rays with such limited offsets and small contrasts will reach the third layer, but you can check when looking at the first-arrival traveltime curves slope. But anyway you can set the model depth by |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Dear community,
First and foremost, thanks for making open-source codes and for your support.
I recently started my work with pyGIMLi and want to make a simple 3D Refraction modeling and inversion with it. The 2D example is presented here. I am using pyGIMLi
1.4.0
.This is my code:
And the following graph comes with this line of code:
But as you can see the data only covers depths to -22 m:
To be honest I am not sure which mistakes I have done. Therefore, I am looking for hints from people who are using pyGIMLi.
Thanks
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions