Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Defining the format #3

Open
gilligan opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 9 comments
Open

Defining the format #3

gilligan opened this issue Jan 20, 2016 · 9 comments

Comments

@gilligan
Copy link
Owner

My rough idea of the event would be :

Speakers present via google hangout or twitch.tv or something similar (see #1) and "visitors" hang out on gitter chat to ask questions. In addition to the speakers there would be a "facilitator" that presents questions raised on irc to presenters.

Any suggestions on this ?

@jethrolarson
Copy link

If conf is over twitch then using that chat is natural.

@CrossEye
Copy link

I haven't used twitch at all. I'm going to have to go investigate....

@buzzdecafe
Copy link

looks like twitch is flash-based? if so that's a 👎 for me

@jethrolarson
Copy link

I thought it worked on mobile...

On Sat, Jan 23, 2016, 9:09 AM Michael Hurley [email protected]
wrote:

looks like twitch is flash-based? if so that's a [image: 👎] for me


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3 (comment).

@buzzdecafe
Copy link

maybe so -- all i saw when i arrived there was a solicitations to install flash

@gilligan
Copy link
Owner Author

So what has come up in the gitter chat is something like hosted viewings:

The plan is to dedicate a conference room to RamdaConf at the Plaid office in San Francisco, so other members of the Ramda community in the Bay Area are welcome to watch the talks with me and other members of the Plaid team. This'll give the event a bit more of a conference feel.

I would probably do the same in our office in Munich then. Others could follow suit ;)

Furthermore @davidchambers suggested:

I suggest we keep this modest. Four or five speakers as @jethrolarson suggested sounds like the sweet spot to me. If each presentation is 30 minutes, say, plus 10 minutes at the end for additional questions and 5 minutes for resolving the inevitable technical issues, we're looking at 3–4 hours. This is a good length of time, I think. Enough content to make it feel like an occasion, without making it infeasible to watch all the talks.

I am not sure about the 30mins since this sounds kind of short for me. But that is probably also something that the presenters need to think about and which I will ask them as soon as a choice has an actual selection has been made.

@CrossEye
Copy link

I would have no problem acting more as emcee, introducing speakers and maybe interspersing with a total of ten or fifteen minutes on the history of Ramda. I don't have any particular subject I want to talk about in any case, and I feel a little awed by the other speakers already signed up.

@jethrolarson
Copy link

I can maybe squeeze my material down to 30mins . Last time I ran through it was 50

@davidchambers
Copy link

30 minutes was just a suggestion. Longer talks are fine with me. I think we should aim to keep the combined length to four hours. I'm happy not to present this time. The nice thing about an online conference is that we can hold one every three or four months if we want to. :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants