Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RNASeqc workflows erroring out (when a sample has no reads mapped?) #83

Open
matren395 opened this issue Jul 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@matren395
Copy link

Hello,

I am running the RNASeqc calling pipeline (workflow configuration: broadinstitute_gtex/rnaseqc2_v1-0_BETA_cfg_XRDtyM5Po5Y) using GTEx v8 tissue samples and looking for primarily gene counts in two kinds of GTF input files - one for Ensembl 89 protein-coding genes and other GTFs for intergenic sequences (non-coding ORFs as well as non-ORFs) as controls. Running the rnaseqc2_v1-0_BETA_cfg workflow on the Ensembl 89 protein-coding GTF gives me no problems, but for my intergenic GTFs there is a weird failure mode where about 3% of the GTEx Samples will fail (apparently) when computing the metrics file, throwing an error that says:

Total runtime: 299; Total CPU Time: 269
Average Reads/Sec: 302612
Estimating library complexity...
Generating report
Invalid range
Cannot compute median of an empty list

before going on to not generate the gene_reads.gct.gz file . I would think that it's a format issue, but this is only happening for some GTEx Samples - and more weirdly, it is only happening in some GTFs, and some other GTFs that I have produced the same way and formatted the same do not throw this error.

My hypothesis is that it's failing out when a sample has no reads/features mapped to it - after reaching out to Francois Aguet he had the same guess as well, and suggested that I submit an issue here.

Let me know what a fix or workaround would look like, or if you can figure out what's happening or what their could be to do! And let me know if there's anything more I could/should provide for this or any way to help!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant