-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 166
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding CEDS at 0.1 degree as a global emission inventory #1745
Comments
Thanks @1Dandan. A couple of questions:
|
Hi @yantosca,
I did not use For 2), Yes, as indicated in above original description, the sample |
Hi @1Dandan, this looks good! The biggest thing is that the data is now on the standard calendar, and that time[0] = 0, which facilitates GCHP input. I would say this is good to go. |
Hi @yantosca, thanks. I may add the attributes of |
Hi @yantosca, just to let you know that
|
Thanks @1Dandan! |
This update is now marked as delivered on the Model Development Priority page as well. |
Hi @1Dandan, thank you for preparing the data! I noticed reversed seasonality in v2023-04 compared to v2021-06. The figure provides an example of the global mean NH3 emission rate from the agricultural sector. This reversed seasonality is observed in other species as well, including NO. It might worth a double-check. |
Thanks @Ruijun-Dang and @1Dandan. I will hold off on implementing this until we resolve the seasonality issue. |
Thanks @Ruijun-Dang for your caution and patience and thanks @yantosca for reminding. I also noticed that the seasonality of all species from all sectors is flipped for CEDS at 0.1 degree from CEDS at 0.5 degree, which is originated from the original dataset from PNNL. The attached plots show that the seasonality for CEDS at 0.1 degree is flipped from CEDS at 0.5 degree for an example year of 2017. The map is plotted from original dataset downloaded from PNNL DataHub (https://data.pnnl.gov/group/nodes/dataset/13488 for CEDS at 0.1, and https://data.pnnl.gov/dataset/CEDS-4-21-21 for CEDS at 0.5) for the absolute differences between May and Sep in the year of 2017, which also confirms the problem. I contacted Steven J. Smith and computing supports from PNNL and they are currently checking into it. I will keep you posted with any further progress. |
Hi @yantosca @msulprizio @Ruijun-Dang, I have received the fixed CEDS at 0.1 degree dataset from PNNL and processed it. The fixed dataset shows consistent seasonality versus CEDS v2 at 0.5 degree: The processed dataset is available at:
|
Name and Institution (Required)
Name: Dandan Zhang
Institution: Washington University in St. Louis
New GEOS-Chem feature
Hi, I am writing to request adding CEDS at 0.1 degree as a global emission inventory to support high-resolution global or regional simulations.
Original dataset of CEDS at 0.1 degree from year 1980 to 2019 can be requested and downloaded from https://data.pnnl.gov/group/nodes/dataset/13488, which includes fine-scale emission fluxes on the top of CEDS v2 at 0.5 degree. I have downloaded and processed the dataset to be readily usable by GEOS-Chem.
Process dataset is available at: http://geoschemdata.wustl.edu/ExtData/HEMCO/CEDS/v2023-04/,
where
subdirectories at each year contains monthly emission fluxes for each species;
config/ contains
HEMCO_Config.rc
andExtData.rc
files modified to facilitate using CEDS at 0.1 degree for GCHP version 13.4.1;scripts/ contains processing scripts.
To verify it, I regrid processed CEDS at 0.1 to 0.5 degree by area-weighted regridding to maintain same emission fluxes at different resolutions and compare it with the current CEDS v2 at 0.5 degree (http://geoschemdata.wustl.edu/ExtData/HEMCO/CEDS/v2021-06/) for annual mean emissions in year 2018.
Comparison plots:
Comp_Emissions_CEDS01_vs_CEDSv2_2018_AnnMean.pdf
Above plots show that the differences between the two are negligible as expected. Thus the processed dataset should be readily usable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: