Our goal is to make contributing to the Libra project easy and transparent.
Note: As the Libra Core project is currently an early-stage prototype, it is undergoing rapid development. While we welcome contributions, before making substantial contributions be sure to discuss them in the Discourse forum to ensure that they fit into the project roadmap.
To contribute to the Libra Core implementation, first start with the proper development copy.
To get the development installation with all the necessary dependencies for linting, testing, and building the documentation, run the following:
git clone https://github.com/libra/libra.git
cd libra
./scripts/dev_setup.sh
cargo build
cargo xtest
Refer to our Coding Guidelines for detailed guidance about how to contribute to the project.
Libra's website is also open source (the code can be found in this repository). It is built using Docusaurus:
If you know Markdown, you can already contribute! This lives in the website repo.
Changes to the project are proposed through pull requests. The general pull request workflow is as follows:
- Fork the repo and create a topic branch off of
master
. - If you have added code that should be tested, add unit tests.
- If you have changed APIs, update the documentation. Make sure the documentation builds.
- Ensure all tests and lints pass on each and every commit that is part of
your pull request.
cargo x lint && cargo xfmt && cargo xclippy --all-targets
- If you haven't already, complete the Contributor License Agreement (CLA).
- Submit your pull request.
Commits should be atomic and broken down into logically separate changes. Diffs should also be made easy for reviewers to read and review so formatting fixes or code moves should not be included in commits with actual code changes.
Commit messages are important and incredibly helpful for others when they dig through the commit history in order to understand why a particular change was made and what problem it was intending to solve. For this reason commit messages should be well written and conform with the following format:
All commit messages should begin with a single short (50 character max) line summarizing the change and should skip the full stop. This is the title of the commit. It is also preferred that this summary be prefixed with "[area]" where the area is an identifier for the general area of the code being modified, e.g.
* [ci] enforce whitelist of nightly features
* [language] removing VerificationPass trait
A non-exhaustive list of some other areas include:
- consensus
- mempool
- network
- storage
- execution
- vm
Following the commit title (unless it alone is self-explanatory), there should be a single blank line followed by the commit body which includes more detailed, explanatory text as separate paragraph(s). It is recommended that the commit body be wrapped at 72 characters so that Git has plenty of room to indent the text while still keeping everything under 80 characters overall.
The commit body should provide a meaningful commit message, which:
- Explains the problem the change tries to solve, i.e. what is wrong with the current code without the change.
- Justifies the way the change solves the problem, i.e. why the result with the change is better.
- Alternative solutions considered but discarded, if any.
If you want to reference a previous commit in the history of the project, use the format "abbreviated sha1 (subject, date)", with the subject enclosed in a pair of double-quotes, like this:
Commit 895b53510 ("[consensus] remove slice_patterns feature", 2019-07-18)
noticed that ...
This invocation of git show
can be used to obtain this format:
git show -s --date=short --pretty='format:%h ("%s", %ad)' <commit>
If a commit references an issue please add a reference to the body of your
commit message, e.g. issue #1234
or fixes #456
. Using keywords like
fixes
, resolves
, or closes
will cause the corresponding issue to be
closed when the pull request is merged.
Avoid adding any @
mentions to commit messages, instead add them to the PR
cover letter.
During the review process a reviewer may ask you to make changes to your pull request. If a particular commit needs to be changed, that commit should be amended directly. Changes in response to a review should not be made in separate commits on top of your PR unless it logically makes sense to have separate, distinct commits for those changes. This helps keep the commit history clean.
If your pull request is out-of-date and needs to be updated because master
has advanced, you should rebase your branch on top of the latest master by
doing the following:
git fetch upstream
git checkout topic
git rebase -i upstream/master
You should not update your branch by merging the latest master into your branch. Merge commits included in PRs tend to make it more difficult for the reviewer to understand the change being made, especially if the merge wasn't clean and needed conflicts to be resolved. As such, PRs with merge commits will be rejected.
It is important that the project history is bisect-able so that when
regressions are identified we can easily use git bisect
to be able to
pin-point the exact commit which introduced the regression. This requires that
every commit is able to be built and passes all lints and tests. So if your
pull request includes multiple commits be sure that each and every commit is
able to be built and passes all checks performed by CI.
For pull request to be accepted by any Libra projects, a CLA must be signed. You will only need to do this once to work on any of Libra's open source projects. Individuals contributing on their own behalf can sign the Individual CLA. If you are contributing on behalf of your employer, please ask them to sign the Corporate CLA.
Libra uses GitHub issues to track bugs. Please include necessary information and instructions to reproduce your issue.