Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geographic scope of dataset panel #261

Closed
ymgan opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 4 comments
Closed

geographic scope of dataset panel #261

ymgan opened this issue Sep 8, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@ymgan
Copy link

ymgan commented Sep 8, 2023

Hey

When I click a dataset, the panel that shows up at the right seems to be squeezing the geographic scope info together (please see screenshot below)

Screenshot 2023-09-08 at 09 38 47

Thanks a lot!

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

I just added dataset pages to the hosted portals.
e.g. https://hp-theme.gbif-staging.org/dataset/b86fe411-8e62-4cd0-aab2-914d75401598#metrics

I'm currently thinking that I will revisit that occurrence dataset list. And make the list richer, and make links point to either (config dependant) gbif.org or a dataset page on the hosted portal for more details. In other words remove the dataset overlay.

Would that make sense to you please?

@ymgan
Copy link
Author

ymgan commented Sep 8, 2023

@MortenHofft this is beautiful and excellent!! I appreciate that!!

And make the list richer, and make links point to either (config dependant) gbif.org or a dataset page on the hosted portal for more details. In other words remove the dataset overlay.

Yes that makes sense to me :) Thank you!!!

@MortenHofft
Copy link
Member

I've done an experiment with embedding the full dataset in the drawer. It is on UAT.
I find that it works well so far. So perhaps we should actually try that. It would benefit from a link to the dataset on its own URL if any such is available on the site.

https://hp-antarctic.gbif-uat.org/occurrence/search?view=DATASETS

@ymgan
Copy link
Author

ymgan commented Sep 9, 2023

Thank you Morten!! It looks much better! Yes, that makes sense to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants