You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Epic: Maintain a vulnerability list by release (GLVD)
Summary
As Garden Linux adopter, I would like to be able to identify what vulnerabilities(CVEs) are relevant for given Garden Linux release. The CVEs should be mapped to to the packages in the release.
Requirements
The API design and implementation follows industry best practices like the Microsoft REST API Guidelines -> Azure REST API Guidelines or at least the most essential sections covering HTTP Request / Response Pattern, HTTP Return Codes.
The API provides clear, up-to-date developer friendly documentation according to a common standard, like OpenAPI Specification which is served together with the API for example over Swagger Open Source tools
As of today, single deployment is sufficient. It should contain always the latest version of the main branch.
NIST : Ingest all NIST metric versions, not only v3.
Definition of done
As user, I can use a public HTTP endpoint that is serving a well designed and versioned API and complete documentation for each allowed request. Preferred solution is to have HTTP REST API that can serve me documentation, schema and real data.
The user can query for published release and get the list of packages involved and their known vulnerabilities.
Limitations or not included in scope
This does not yet require a nice user interface, an HTTP API is sufficient
This does not yet include knowledge about which packages are included in any given Garden Linux image, the user provides a list of package names and versions
Tasks
Nov
Oct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Epic: Maintain a vulnerability list by release (GLVD)
Summary
As Garden Linux adopter, I would like to be able to identify what vulnerabilities(CVEs) are relevant for given Garden Linux release. The CVEs should be mapped to to the packages in the release.
Requirements
Definition of done
Limitations or not included in scope
Tasks
Nov
Oct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: