Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve webpage #204

Closed
cdeil opened this issue Jan 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Improve webpage #204

cdeil opened this issue Jan 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cdeil
Copy link
Contributor

cdeil commented Jan 19, 2018

@pdeiml - I see that we now have this thanks to your additions:

I tried to use it for the first time to look up some infos, and have some suggestions:

  • change the links so that clicking doesn't download, but display the data (e.g. on the webpage or just link to the file on Github). Download can maybe be useful as well, but then in addition, usually clicking on things should show the info in the browser
  • the publication list isn't very useful. Just linking to the corresponding folder on Github would be very helpful.
  • I think adding a link for each source to gamma-sky.net would be good. Example: http://gamma-sky.net/#/cat/tev/25 I don't think we'll have interactive stuff in the gamma-cat webpage, so linking to gamma-sky.net is useful. once we have better content here, we can re-discuss how to avoid duplication, but for now, cross-linking is useful for us and users.

@pdeiml - Thoughts?

@pdeiml
Copy link
Collaborator

pdeiml commented Jan 22, 2018

  • I can add a link to the github-page, no problem. But download without cloning the whole repo should be possible as well. Can you tell me how to tell sphinx that the data should be shown in the browser and not to be downloaded?

  • My plan of the publication list: Click on a reference_id and a new page opens where we provide more information about the reference. First of all the corresponding data. Another nice information would be author, year and title but would need a lot of time because this can not be done via python scripts, I think, it must be inserted by hand. Or we create a database with all information about the references and fill the webpage from that via python but then the information has to be written by hand as well.

  • You mean a link to the github-repo or to the webpage itself? I think to the webpage itself, no?

@cdeil
Copy link
Contributor Author

cdeil commented Jan 25, 2018

We discussed this on Skype just now, I think it's clear. I'd suggest to do a minimal solution that surfaces the relevant data / files here, and then if you have more time, I would consider #193 and #198 high priority.

To see the download behaviour of the links via a webserver locally:

cd docs/_build/html
python -m http.server
# visit localhost in your browser

@cdeil
Copy link
Contributor Author

cdeil commented Jan 28, 2018

The suggestions above were implemented in #208

@cdeil cdeil closed this as completed Jan 28, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants