Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incomprehension regarding data processing #25

Open
PBordesInstadeep opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Incomprehension regarding data processing #25

PBordesInstadeep opened this issue Sep 23, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@PBordesInstadeep
Copy link

Hello,

I have a few questions regarding the way you process the data.

  1. In your code you seem to use nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_train.txt and nrPDB-GO_2020.06.18_annot.tsv to build the training data, but in your data you only have nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_annot.tsv, is it normal ?

  2. I analyzed your results file (DeepCNN-MERGED_molecular_function_results.pckl, DeepCNN-MERGED_cellular_component_results.pckl), and the size of the test set is the same depending on the ontologies. However, in your Supplementary table, you say that the size of the test set differ between MF, BP, CC. Why ?

  3. In your Supplementary Table, the train/val/test set have different sizes depending on MF, BP, CC. Shouldn't they have the same size ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant