You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a few questions regarding the way you process the data.
In your code you seem to use nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_train.txt and nrPDB-GO_2020.06.18_annot.tsv to build the training data, but in your data you only have nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_annot.tsv, is it normal ?
I analyzed your results file (DeepCNN-MERGED_molecular_function_results.pckl, DeepCNN-MERGED_cellular_component_results.pckl), and the size of the test set is the same depending on the ontologies. However, in your Supplementary table, you say that the size of the test set differ between MF, BP, CC. Why ?
In your Supplementary Table, the train/val/test set have different sizes depending on MF, BP, CC. Shouldn't they have the same size ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have a few questions regarding the way you process the data.
In your code you seem to use nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_train.txt and nrPDB-GO_2020.06.18_annot.tsv to build the training data, but in your data you only have nrPDB-GO_2019.06.18_annot.tsv, is it normal ?
I analyzed your results file (DeepCNN-MERGED_molecular_function_results.pckl, DeepCNN-MERGED_cellular_component_results.pckl), and the size of the test set is the same depending on the ontologies. However, in your Supplementary table, you say that the size of the test set differ between MF, BP, CC. Why ?
In your Supplementary Table, the train/val/test set have different sizes depending on MF, BP, CC. Shouldn't they have the same size ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: