You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of having a unified generation function as we have now, we might want to adjust our repo in the future in a direction such that users can pick different approaches like:
For Generation: ZEROGEN: efficient zero-shot learning via dataset generation (paper) PROGEN: progressive dataset generation via in-context feedback (paper)
For Annotation: CALIBRATION: prompt-based zero-shot learning with calibration (paper)
...
At last, we should keep the possibility to generate datasets on their own, defining their own sampling strategy, sample information criterion, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think a good idea would be to start implementing one or two of those approaches and see, what needs to be changed. We could then abstract that to be useable with the other approaches. I am interested in implementing one of those. You already have one in mind that is open to implement?
Instead of having a unified generation function as we have now, we might want to adjust our repo in the future in a direction such that users can pick different approaches like:
For Generation:
ZEROGEN
: efficient zero-shot learning via dataset generation (paper)PROGEN
: progressive dataset generation via in-context feedback (paper)For Annotation:
CALIBRATION
: prompt-based zero-shot learning with calibration (paper)...
At last, we should keep the possibility to generate datasets on their own, defining their own sampling strategy, sample information criterion, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: