[Bug] Net Income Adjustment is not applied for QBO instances with no revenue lines

[brandonrf94]

Is there an existing issue for this?

• I have searched the existing issues

Describe the issue

I have a QBO instance that has expenses logged and the net income adjustment is not coming through.

Following the code path for net income adjustment it looks like this code here: https://github.com/fivetran/dbt_quickbooks/blob/ea05fe5647b67fc04b3eb355856d5ca2254495ec/models/intermediate/int_quickbooks__retained_earnings.sql#L35C1-L42C3

assumes that QBO will have revenue and expenses to compute net income adjustment. But what about in cases where there is no revenue (or expenses) recognized yet - only one of the two or neither. The account should still be returned.

Relevant error log or model output

No response

Expected behavior

Net income adjustment is available regardless of revenue or expenses existing.

Possible solution

No response

dbt Project configurations

Most recent quickstart

Package versions

Most recent quickstart

What database are you using dbt with?

snowflake

How are you running this dbt package?

Fivetran Quickstart Data Model

dbt Version

Most recent quickstart

Additional Context

No response

Are you willing to open a PR to help address this issue?

• Yes.
• Yes, but I will need assistance.
• No.

[fivetran-avinash]

Hey @brandonrf94 , good callout! I wonder if we can adjust the base of the CTE to account for this by pulling directly from the original intermediate model. Something like

net_income_loss as (

    select 
        general_ledger_balances.period_first_day,
        general_ledger_balances.source_relation,
        coalesce(revenue_net_change, 0) as revenue_net_change, 
        coalesce(revenue_net_converted_change, 0) as revenue_net_converted_change,
        coalesce(expense_net_change, 0) as expense_net_change,
        coalesce(expense_net_converted_change, 0) as expense_net_converted_change
    from general_ledger_balances
    left join revenue_starter
        on general_ledger_balances.period_first_day = revenue_starter.period_first_day
        and general_ledger_balances.source_relation = revenue_starter.source_relation
    left join expense_starter 
        on general_ledger_balances.period_first_day = expense_starter.period_first_day
        and general_ledger_balances.source_relation = expense_starter.source_relation
),

Might do the trick in terms of bringing in those periods which are lacking revenue/expense lines. If you grab the compiled code from your target folder and substitute this CTE instead of the existing one, does that make a difference?

[brandonrf94]

How do I get the compiled code when using a quickstart?

[fivetran-avinash]

Ahh good call @brandonrf94 🤦🏽 . Let me try and get a pre-release branch ready for you to test these changes by early next week.

We also are going to refactor the CTE to be more optimal computationally. Something like

net_income_loss as (

    select
        period_first_day,
        source_relation,
        sum(case when account_class = 'Revenue' then period_net_change else 0) as revenue_net_change,
        sum(case when account_class = 'Revenue' then period_net_converted_change else 0) as revenue_net_converted_change,
        sum(case when account_class = 'Expense' then period_net_change else 0) as expense_net_change,
        sum(case when account_class = 'Expense' then period_net_converted_change else 0) as expense_net_converted_change
    from general_ledger_balances
    {{ dbt_utils.group_by(2) }} 
),

will replace all the existing CTEs.

[fivetran-avinash]

Hi @brandonrf94 , just to give you an update, we are creating a pre-release branch for you to test and validate that these changes will work for you in Quickstart. We are hoping to have this released soon, and then we can sync with you on how to test this branch internally.

[brandonrf94]

Hi @fivetran-avinash - is this ready for testing?

[fivetran-avinash]

Hi @brandonrf94, I've created this pre-release for testing, but we are dealing with issues in our Quickstart deployment process. Once this is live on Quickstart, we'll let you know the process for testing this out.

[brandonrf94]

hi @fivetran-avinash - any luck here?

[fivetran-avinash]

Hi @brandonrf94, we are unfortunately still waiting for a resolution from our engineering team, there are a few dependencies that need to be resolved before this is ready to go live. We will be in touch when this is ready to try out in Quickstart.