-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature] Add additional Click URI fields to creative history models #49
Comments
Hi @bthomson22 ! Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I am currently working closely with engineering and product for Linkedin Ads and will discuss this with them. I will circle back with you as soon as I get more information! |
Hey there @bthomson22! I spoke to our product manager for Linkedin Ads and wanted to cue you in on the next release of the Linkedin Ads connector, in case you are not already aware. We are currently in the process of switching our APIs for the Linkedin Ads connector for all of our customers (see more information in the release notes). I double checked the fields that you have used in this issue, and unfortunately, these fields are a part of a larger set of fields that will be deprecated with the new API migration. In the meantime, this solution should still continue to work for you, but once your connector updates, these values will start to populate as null going forward (your company should be receiving communications around this before it happens, of course). That being said, once your connector is updated, we would be happy to work with you to brainstorm a potentially new solution given the new resulting data from the API change. |
Are there any further updates on this topic? Tracking Advertising based on URLs is essential to us as it is how we tie the dataset together with other sources. |
Hi @sfc-gh-cjwehtje thanks for chiming into this thread! @bthomson22 and I have chatted a bit regarding some possible solutions to adding click uri fields to the models of this package. One solution that Brandon suggested was to leverage the linkedin company pages connector and package to look up the associated This is definitely a viable solution; however, it would require a dependency on another connector and would prefer we can obtain this information directly from the LinkedIn Ads connector. I am still working internally to uncover if there is an alternative solution we can leverage to obtain this information without the use of an additional connector. I will continue to share more as I investigate. |
Thanks @fivetran-joemarkiewicz! Just a heads up, we recently had to update our models to leverage the I'm happy to share more on how we've worked around this - but to your point, it would be great if it was solved within the LinkedIn Ads connector itself. |
Is there an existing feature request for this?
Describe the Feature
Currently, the creative history models only look for the
click_uri
field to generate UTM parameters on a per-creative basis. Unfortunately, this field is only populated toTEXT_AD
types. Therefore, in downstream URL reports, no ads with theSPONSORED_STATUS_UPDATE
orSPONSORED_VIDEO
(among others) will populate.If the org has the
LinkedInCreativeURL Feature Flag
turned on in Fivetran, there are several other columns where this information can be parsed from. These fields include:SPONSORED_UPDATE_SHARE_CONTENT_CONTENT_ENTITIES
SPONSORED_VIDEO_USER_GENERATED_CONTENT_POST_VALUE_SPECIFIC_CONTENT_SHARE_CONTENT_MEDIA
SPONSORED_UPDATE_CAROUSEL_SHARE_CONTENT_CONTENT_ENTITIES
The values in those fields resemble the below structure (example data):
Describe alternatives you've considered
To resolve this in our internal project, we created a model immediately before
stg_linkedin_ads__creative_history_tmp
that does the following:This requires the following update in
dbt_project.yml
to override thecreative_history
var:DAG for reference:
Are you interested in contributing this feature?
Anything else?
Before putting up a PR, it would be great to know if Fivetran is planning to enable this feature flag by default for all customers. If so, there won't be any need for variable logic so that someone can turn this on/off. Knowing this would be ideal before contributing to the fix.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: