-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Not all keys showing in explorer tree #91
Comments
Hi @rickwargo , i will try to reproduce, thank you for the issue. |
Hi @rickwargo , i think i fixed this issue can you try new release to check it? |
I think i understand your issue, please load all keys 3000, because for tree we using scan command, but you check via KEYS. I think scan loaded only part of keys. |
That makes sense. The 1000 limit is confusing here as I would expect them all to appear, but they won't. I like the treeview display, however, I do not think it represents the data accurately unless all data are read. What about recursively descending each branch to completion instead of grabbing the next N (1000) keys? You may end up in a scenario where N' read is either < N or N' > N, but at least it is visually accurate, except for the last branch. That last branch could either be read to completion, possibly far over-reaching the original limit or it could be removed/not read, possibly under-reaching the limit. Additionally (or alternatively), you could inform the number of keys required to complete a branch. I don't believe a treeview can be processed linearly; it can recursively traverse the tree. |
After connecting to my Redis database (on AWS), I filter the keys using freqreg:2018122315* as a filter in "Load content of database", however, there is a key that does not show.
You can see in the screenshot it exists, and it did appear when I issued the KEYS command:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: