fix(modern_bpf): null destination address in sendto and sendmsg syscalls

[mrgian]

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment one (or more) /kind <> lines:

/kind bug

/kind cleanup

/kind design

/kind documentation

/kind failing-test

/kind feature

Any specific area of the project related to this PR?

Uncomment one (or more) /area <> lines:

/area API-version

/area build

/area CI

/area driver-kmod

/area driver-bpf

/area driver-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-bpf

/area libscap-engine-gvisor

/area libscap-engine-kmod

/area libscap-engine-modern-bpf

/area libscap-engine-nodriver

/area libscap-engine-noop

/area libscap-engine-source-plugin

/area libscap-engine-savefile

/area libscap

/area libpman

/area libsinsp

/area tests

/area proposals

Does this PR require a change in the driver versions?

/version driver-API-version-major

/version driver-API-version-minor

/version driver-API-version-patch

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-major

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-minor

/version driver-SCHEMA-version-patch

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

[mrgian]

cc @Andreagit97

[Andreagit97]

Great catch! Thank you for this! What about adding a dedicated test case for sendto and sendmsg in the drivers test to avoid regressions?

[Andreagit97]

/approve

[poiana]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: a732269c044bfcb7ffffe4079e2aa0c2b0aa50d5

[FedeDP]

/approve

[poiana]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Andreagit97, FedeDP, mrgian

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Andreagit97,FedeDP]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment