We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug
Gentoo QA complains about the following potential problems with strict-aliasing violations when doing naughty pointer things:
/tmp/portage/dev-debug/sysdig-0.38.1/work/libs-0.17.2/userspace/libsinsp/fdinfo.cpp: In member function 'virtual libsinsp::state::static_struct::field_infos sinsp_fdinfo::static_fields() const': /tmp/portage/dev-debug/sysdig-0.38.1/work/libs-0.17.2/userspace/libsinsp/fdinfo.cpp:149:41: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] 149 | define_static_field(ret, this, ((uint64_t*) &m_sockinfo.m_ipv6info.m_fields.m_sip)[0], "socket_ipv6_src_ip_low"); | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /tmp/portage/dev-debug/sysdig-0.38.1/work/libs-0.17.2/userspace/libsinsp/fdinfo.cpp:151:41: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] 151 | define_static_field(ret, this, ((uint64_t*) &m_sockinfo.m_ipv6info.m_fields.m_dip)[0], "socket_ipv6_dest_ip_low"); | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ /tmp/portage/dev-debug/sysdig-0.38.1/work/libs-0.17.2/userspace/libsinsp/fdinfo.cpp:159:41: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Wstrict-aliasing] 159 | define_static_field(ret, this, ((uint64_t*) &m_sockinfo.m_ipv6serverinfo.m_ip)[0], "socket_ipv6_server_ip_low"); | ~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How to reproduce it
Building sysdig-0.38.x+libs-0.17.2 with gcc-13.3 and -Werror=strict-aliasing should show this.
-Werror=strict-aliasing
Expected behaviour
No QA violations (if possible)
Environment
Gentoo Linux, ~amd64 (testing)
6.10.0 :)
From source - I am the package maintainer
Additional context
I understand that accessing the union needs to accommodate the IPv6 address and have no immediate solution either. Sorry 😞
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
/cc @LucaGuerra our pointer hero!
Sorry, something went wrong.
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
/remove-lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.
/close
Provide feedback via https://github.com/falcosecurity/community.
/lifecycle stale
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
/remove-lifecycle rotten
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
/lifecycle rotten
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Gentoo QA complains about the following potential problems with strict-aliasing violations when doing naughty pointer things:
How to reproduce it
Building sysdig-0.38.x+libs-0.17.2 with gcc-13.3 and
-Werror=strict-aliasing
should show this.Expected behaviour
No QA violations (if possible)
Environment
Gentoo Linux, ~amd64 (testing)
6.10.0 :)
From source - I am the package maintainer
Additional context
I understand that accessing the union needs to accommodate the IPv6 address and have no immediate solution either. Sorry 😞
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: