Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fully adversarial training #1

Open
faroit opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

Fully adversarial training #1

faroit opened this issue Oct 6, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@faroit
Copy link

faroit commented Oct 6, 2018

Before I try it myself, I wanted to ask if you tried training the network without finetuning and starting from scratch with a fully adversarial training. Is that too hard to train? Did you try some other conditional GAN flavors?

@faroit
Copy link
Author

faroit commented Oct 24, 2018

Ping @f90

@f90
Copy link
Owner

f90 commented Oct 25, 2018

Sorry for the late reply I didn't realise you have to watch your OWN repositories for changes to be messaged to you by mail!

Yes I tried training from scratch, but then you don't get enough stability, at least when you use the normal GAN or other variants that are not super heavily stabilised already. Also training tends to take longer to converge.

In the end I found the Wasserstein GAN to be the most stable, so I figure with a bit of tweaking it should be possible to train it in a fully adversarial way, without needing pretraining or other things (like the guys that did SVSGAN), but still... It can be tricky, be aware! But hey, maybe you get something good working, it's possible since we didn't actually focus on that setting in our paper, we wanted to explore how we can use the GAN for semi-supervised/unsupervised training with unpaired data, so the MSE is a natural solution for the paired data and also stabilises training a lot, so we didn't have to worry so much about GAN stability anymore.

Hope that answers your questions?

Good luck :)
Daniel

@f90 f90 added the question label Dec 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants