From 2e4104a0181123207689f0a5fc3f887c9df41bd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kamil Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 21:25:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo and 404 links (#2723) --- .../practice/nucleotide-count/.approaches/introduction.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/exercises/practice/nucleotide-count/.approaches/introduction.md b/exercises/practice/nucleotide-count/.approaches/introduction.md index d1ed25ce8..daee795d1 100644 --- a/exercises/practice/nucleotide-count/.approaches/introduction.md +++ b/exercises/practice/nucleotide-count/.approaches/introduction.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Or you can use `if` with a short statement. ## General guidance -The key to solving Nucelotide Count is to look up valid nucleotides and to error on invalid input. +The key to solving Nucleotide Count is to look up valid nucleotides and to error on invalid input. ## Approach: `switch` statement @@ -76,6 +76,6 @@ For more information, check the [`if` with short statement approach][approach-if The `if` with short statement approach benchmarked the fastest. To compare performance of the approaches, check the [Performance article][article-performance]. -[approach-switch-statement]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucelotide-count/approaches/switch-statement -[approach-if-with-short-statement]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucelotide-count/approaches/if-with-short-statement -[article-performance]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucelotide-count/articles/performance +[approach-switch-statement]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucleotide-count/approaches/switch-statement +[approach-if-with-short-statement]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucleotide-count/approaches/if-with-short-statement +[article-performance]: https://exercism.org/tracks/go/exercises/nucleotide-count/articles/performance