Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

updateForkChoice: rlp: element is larger than containing list #12896

Open
awskii opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

updateForkChoice: rlp: element is larger than containing list #12896

awskii opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
imp1 High importance
Milestone

Comments

@awskii
Copy link
Member

awskii commented Nov 27, 2024

90bb280 ethmainnet

caught in deadloop

[DBUG] [11-27|21:23:50.653] UnwindTo                                 block=21280278 stack="[sync.go:174 forkchoice.go:346 asm_amd64.s:1695]"
[DBUG] [11-27|21:23:50.673] [1/6 OtterSync] DONE                     in=4.886µs
[DBUG] [11-27|21:23:50.673] [2/6 BlockHashes] DONE                   in=990ns
[INFO] [11-27|21:23:50.673] [3/6 Senders] Started                    from=21280278 to=21281743[DBUG] [11-27|21:23:50.673] Error while executing stage              err="[3/6 Senders] rlp: element is larger than containing list"
[WARN] [11-27|21:23:50.673] Cannot update chain head                 hash=0x6d55772b4ca5262026687ec811847b5390ca076a91ecb1c26a0be5c0129c4895 err="updateForkChoice: [3/6 Senders] rlp: element is larger than containing list"
[WARN] [11-27|21:23:50.673] error executing clstage                  app=caplin stage=ForkChoice err="failed to compute and notify services of new fork choice: failed to run forkchoice: execution Client RPC failed to retrieve ForkChoiceUpdate response, err: updateForkChoice: [3/6 Senders] rlp: element is larger than containing list"
@awskii
Copy link
Member Author

awskii commented Nov 28, 2024

revert bad commit PR #12897

@awskii
Copy link
Member Author

awskii commented Nov 29, 2024

helped cd418eb

During my bisect i was also reverting this commit but ended up with not working version, current main works just fine 002d9a2

@awskii awskii self-assigned this Nov 29, 2024
@awskii awskii added this to the 3.0.0-beta1 milestone Nov 29, 2024
@yperbasis yperbasis added the imp1 High importance label Nov 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
imp1 High importance
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants