Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Resolve data model discrepancies #2707

Closed
markusdregi opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Resolve data model discrepancies #2707

markusdregi opened this issue Jan 12, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@markusdregi
Copy link
Contributor

markusdregi commented Jan 12, 2022

Why?
These discrepancies frequently hinders development progress, as well as it introduces new and solidifies old shortcuts in the implementation. It would also be beneficial for future concept discussions if the data model was more established in the team and shared between ert2, ert3 and ert-storage.

Definition of Done
The current data model is documented, implemented in ert-storage, represented by the ERT Data API and is sufficient to serve as a data model for both ERT2 and ERT3. In particular, the utilised part of the data model by ERT2 should be a subset of what ERT3 utilises. Also, the user-data field should no longer be utilised by ERT2 nor ERT3. Last, webviz-ert should function on top of the updated API.

As a consequence, the "global records" __ensemble_records__ should disappear from the ert.storage module.

Related issues:

@sondreso
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this issue as the project has taken a different direction than indicated in this milestone

@sondreso sondreso closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 20, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in SCOUT Mar 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants