You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why?
These discrepancies frequently hinders development progress, as well as it introduces new and solidifies old shortcuts in the implementation. It would also be beneficial for future concept discussions if the data model was more established in the team and shared between ert2, ert3 and ert-storage.
Definition of Done
The current data model is documented, implemented in ert-storage, represented by the ERT Data API and is sufficient to serve as a data model for both ERT2 and ERT3. In particular, the utilised part of the data model by ERT2 should be a subset of what ERT3 utilises. Also, the user-data field should no longer be utilised by ERT2 nor ERT3. Last, webviz-ert should function on top of the updated API.
As a consequence, the "global records" __ensemble_records__ should disappear from the ert.storage module.
Why?
These discrepancies frequently hinders development progress, as well as it introduces new and solidifies old shortcuts in the implementation. It would also be beneficial for future concept discussions if the data model was more established in the team and shared between
ert2
,ert3
andert-storage
.Definition of Done
The current data model is documented, implemented in
ert-storage
, represented by the ERT Data API and is sufficient to serve as a data model for both ERT2 and ERT3. In particular, the utilised part of the data model by ERT2 should be a subset of what ERT3 utilises. Also, theuser-data
field should no longer be utilised by ERT2 nor ERT3. Last,webviz-ert
should function on top of the updated API.As a consequence, the "global records"
__ensemble_records__
should disappear from theert.storage
module.Related issues:
userdata
fromRecord
toRecordInfo
ert-storage#195The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: