You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At present, the AI field contains only two venues (AAAI; IJCAI) and ML contains three (ICML; ICLR; NeurIPS). A noteworthy omission for AI is the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), which is a top long-running venue for diverse topics including statistical methods, Bayesian techniques, approximate inference, causal learning, optimization, nonparametrics, numerical methods, AI theory, etc. The need for a more representative theory venue, specifically mentioning AISTATS, has also been noted in #5428 and #5677.
Admittedly, I do not know the formal inclusion criteria for csrankings. At the surface level:
AISTATS submissions have grown by ~500% in the last 10 years; matching ICML and outpacing IJCAI.
AISTATS 2024 acceptance rate is 27.6%, similar to several current venues; e.g., ICLR 2024 is 30.5% and ICML 2024 is 27.5%.
Google Scholar lists AISTATS among the top venues in terms of h5-index and h5-median statistics, keeping in mind AISTATS has much fewer accepted total papers as compared to the other conferences in that list.
I do appreciate the need to minimize the number of changes to this list to maintain stability. However, it seems worth including a more representative top AI venue that covers important topics which are not traditionally captured by IJCAI/AAAI (on the AI side) or by NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR (on the ML side).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Maintainers,
At present, the AI field contains only two venues (AAAI; IJCAI) and ML contains three (ICML; ICLR; NeurIPS). A noteworthy omission for AI is the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), which is a top long-running venue for diverse topics including statistical methods, Bayesian techniques, approximate inference, causal learning, optimization, nonparametrics, numerical methods, AI theory, etc. The need for a more representative theory venue, specifically mentioning AISTATS, has also been noted in #5428 and #5677.
Admittedly, I do not know the formal inclusion criteria for csrankings. At the surface level:
I do appreciate the need to minimize the number of changes to this list to maintain stability. However, it seems worth including a more representative top AI venue that covers important topics which are not traditionally captured by IJCAI/AAAI (on the AI side) or by NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR (on the ML side).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: