Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch processing #6

Open
tischi opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 15 comments
Open

Batch processing #6

tischi opened this issue Sep 14, 2020 · 15 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator

tischi commented Sep 14, 2020

How can we batch this across folders or tables?

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 14, 2020

We will only have the option to process from table.

@tischi tischi added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 16, 2020
@tischi tischi self-assigned this Sep 16, 2020
@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 16, 2020

  • Try to get headless running
  • Try out the idea of using Json to instantiate the class that does the job

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

From Tischi:

There are now two versions of imagej-utils.

  1. You need now 0.5.5 (the newer one)
  2. You need to delete 0.5.4 in case it is in your Fiji/jars folder => there must be only one image-utils.jar !

PastedGraphic-1

Best wishes,
Christian

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

@schraivo
How many tables would you typically like to process in one batch?

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

See also question above but also have a look at the new user interface below.
I want to enable processing of multiple tables. Does this make sense?

image

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

@schraivo
I updated imflow-0.1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar to contain the new UI.
Please test the preview functionalities.
Batch processing is not working yet.

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

Batch processing on local computer should work now as well.

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

@schraivo
How many tables would you typically like to process in one batch?

Hi Tischi, it will be around 5-10 Tables at most.

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

See also question above but also have a look at the new user interface below.
I want to enable processing of multiple tables. Does this make sense?

image

In principle exactly what we're looking for. But how is it working? Let's say I have two table selected: Can I set thresholds for each table separately? The idea of selecting a table is cool though, very flexible!!

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

Batch processing on local computer should work now as well.

Cool, will test one thing after the other today. Hard to catch up with your speed :)

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

In principle exactly what we're looking for. But how is it working? Let's say I have two table selected: Can I set thresholds for each table separately?

No you cannot select different thresholds. This is just meant for batch processing of table where you use the same thresholds. If you need different thresholds you would need to start the plugin a second time and select the other tables, which I think that makes sense.

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes makes sense, just to be sure I got it correctly. I am trying it at the moment, so far everything works. The idea with the dataset table list is awesome.

@schraivo
Copy link
Collaborator

schraivo commented Sep 23, 2020

@tischi

I tested the batch processing on local computer (VM Linux):

  • loading of tables WORKS
  • preview images from different tables WORKS
  • Process images from all tables on local computer: ERROR

The ERROR shows that the path is not generated correctly: There are additional ".." between the experiment path and the relativ path extracted from the table, e.g. /g/bdimsort/bla/bla/output/../images/bla.tiff (correct: /g/bdimsort/bla/bla/output/images/bla.tiff).

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

The ERROR shows that the path is not generated correctly: There are additional ".." between the experiment path and the relativ path extracted from the table, e.g. /g/bdimsort/bla/bla/output/../images/bla.tiff (correct: /g/bdimsort/bla/bla/output/images/bla.tiff).

Could you post the whole error message from the console window?

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented Sep 23, 2020

...and tell me which table you are processing? Then I can also try myself...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants