Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Support for StyleTTS2 and OpenVoice TTS Engines #2072

Open
S4lXLV opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

[Feature]: Support for StyleTTS2 and OpenVoice TTS Engines #2072

S4lXLV opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep

Comments

@S4lXLV
Copy link

S4lXLV commented Jun 18, 2024

Summary

Add Openvoice V2 and/or StyleTTS2 TTS

Is your feature request related to a problem?

No

Describe the solution you'd like

Hi, I'm excited to request integration with two impressive TTS (Text-to-Speech) engines: StyleTTS2 and OpenVoice. Both engines offer high-quality voices, and incorporating them into your project would be a fantastic addition.

I attempted to integrate them myself, but unfortunately, I found it too challenging. However, I believe OpenVoice V2, in particular, has great potential and would be an excellent choice. It seems more accessible and performs better.

I'd love to hear your thoughts on this request and look forward to your response.

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional Context

No response

@S4lXLV S4lXLV added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 18, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 29, 2024
@JasonLovesDoggo JasonLovesDoggo added keep and removed stale labels Jul 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 15, 2024
@DraKen0009
Copy link

@JasonLovesDoggo I'll like to work on this one , any suggestions? it'll be my first bigger issue so , a head's up will be great....

@JasonLovesDoggo
Copy link
Collaborator

@JasonLovesDoggo I'll like to work on this one , any suggestions? it'll be my first bigger issue so , a head's up will be great....

It shouldn't be too hard to integrate, you really shouldn't need to modify any files besides creating a new file TTS directory, but look at the other TTS engines for how to actually implement one

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the stale label Jul 26, 2024
@DraKen0009
Copy link

@JasonLovesDoggo I've gone throught the openVoice , it involves installing various dependencies and doesn't offer a library , i think it might make installing the bot much more difficult and pretty heavy.
your thoughts?

@JasonLovesDoggo
Copy link
Collaborator

@JasonLovesDoggo I've gone throught the openVoice , it involves installing various dependencies and doesn't offer a library , i think it might make installing the bot much more difficult and pretty heavy.
your thoughts?

The bot has become quite heavy due to the integration of certain AI features. However, simplicity is key in this context. If a suitable wrapper or library is found or developed, it could certainly enhance the bot's functionality. If not, we may consider leaving it as is.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Aug 6, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request keep
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants