Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multivariate lm and manova give different results #531

Closed
mattansb opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Multivariate lm and manova give different results #531

mattansb opened this issue Nov 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug 🐜 Something isn't working
Milestone

Comments

@mattansb
Copy link
Member

mattansb commented Nov 6, 2022

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68824646/manova-effect-size-partial-eta-squared-in-r/74309524

Need to think about how to tackle local/global effect sizes here...

@mattansb
Copy link
Member Author

mattansb commented Nov 6, 2022

We have:

  1. mlm, maov, manova
  2. Anova.mlm
  • There should be an option to get both the multi- and univariate effect sizes.
    • For multivariate we can only get approximate (F based) effect sizes.
    • For univariate, we can get all.
  • All types should have consistent defaults

I think #526 would need to be resolved first for this to happen.

@mattansb mattansb self-assigned this Nov 7, 2022
@mattansb mattansb added the bug 🐜 Something isn't working label Nov 7, 2022
@mattansb mattansb added this to the CRAN 0.9.0 milestone Nov 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐜 Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant