Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GHA workflow to release Rust #288

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

GHA workflow to release Rust #288

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

paraseba
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@paraseba paraseba marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2024 19:00
@paraseba paraseba requested a review from mpiannucci October 16, 2024 19:01
@paraseba paraseba merged commit 80e7765 into main Oct 16, 2024
1 check passed
@paraseba paraseba deleted the seba/rust-release-workflow branch October 16, 2024 19:03
dcherian added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2024
* main: (167 commits)
  Bump actions/checkout from 2 to 4 in the actions group (#305)
  update zarr pin to v3.0.0b1 (#302)
  Fix non-conformant "attributes" metadata (#303)
  Implement branch reset functionality (#301)
  README minor tune up: syntax and other very minor typos etc (#300)
  remove awaits in icechunk notebook (#298)
  Add missing permission to release action (#295)
  Minor changes to virtual docs (#293)
  Add changelogs (#291)
  Install cargo release (#290)
  Update python ci (#289)
  GHA workflow to release Rust (#288)
  Release 0.1.0-alpha.3 to the Rust world (#287)
  `ByteRange` can do last n bytes now (#285)
  Introduce `Store::list_dir_items` (#286)
  [Docs] Improve virtual ref docs (#284)
  [Docs] correct output dimensions in xr example (#283)
  [Docs] add note for requirements of tutorial data download (#282)
  [Docs] correct module calls to match imports (#281)
  fix(docs): Docs postlaunch fixes (#278)
  ...
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants