Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prioritising Technical Debt as If Time & Money Matters • Adam Tornhill • GOTO 2022 #121

Open
nelsonic opened this issue Jan 29, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue tech-debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written

Comments

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member

Prioritizing Technical Debt as If Time & Money Matters • Adam Tornhill • GOTO 2022: https://youtu.be/w9YhmMPLQ4U
tech-debt

Next on my watch list. ⏭️

@nelsonic nelsonic added discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue tech-debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written labels Jan 29, 2023
@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

The general topic of this talk is a good introduction to Technical Debt.
It's accessible to people provided they have a basic understanding of code.
There aren't any code examples given in any of the slides.
Instead it's very high-level.
Ultimately, people who haven't felt the pain of tech debt won't see the severity of the problem.
So people who are too young/inexperienced will make all the same mistakes of others before them.
Unless you inherit a horror show of a codebase and have to "fix" it for 2+ years, you won't have any idea what paying someone else's technical debt feels like.

Recommend watching the talk. 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
discuss Share your constructive thoughts on how to make progress with this issue tech-debt A feature/requirement implemented in a sub-optimal way & must be re-written
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant