You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the great repo which is pretty easy to read and run.
Whilst I was trying to reproduce the results for the CARS dataset, I found it is quite away from the reported. Specifically, I got something (for training data) around:
For the simplicity, I only went for python train.py since the performance shall be similar between pretrained and non-pretrained models as suggested in the README.md file. The dataset used is the training data from "https://ai.stanford.edu/~jkrause/cars/car_dataset.html", and all other param used are the defaults from train.py.
I wondering if there is anything I missed?
Thank you in advance for your kind help.
Best,
Jian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, my result with pre-trained model (bn_inception) is same with reported on paper:
R@1:85.02
R@8:96.98
embedding dim=1024
loss=loss1+loss2
#loss1=group_loss
#loss2=CE
Hi,
Thanks for the great repo which is pretty easy to read and run.
Whilst I was trying to reproduce the results for the CARS dataset, I found it is quite away from the reported. Specifically, I got something (for training data) around:
For the simplicity, I only went for
python train.py
since the performance shall be similar between pretrained and non-pretrained models as suggested in theREADME.md
file. The dataset used is the training data from "https://ai.stanford.edu/~jkrause/cars/car_dataset.html", and all other param used are the defaults fromtrain.py
.I wondering if there is anything I missed?
Thank you in advance for your kind help.
Best,
Jian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: