You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2024. It is now read-only.
I'm not sure how rowcount is set, so when Worker goes to update a work item as being taken by it, it assumes that of two concurrent executions of:
UPDATE uploaded SET state=1 WHERE state=0 AND id=1;
COMMIT;
after the commit, one cursor will have rowcount=1 and one will have rowcount=0. However, this may not be true, but I'm not sure how to correctly implement a queue removal like this in SQL, or even if it's a sensible thing to try.
An alternative would be to use Python's multiprocessing.Queue, but this is not particularly important while load is low...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If a separate thread makes changes on the same database connection while sqlite3_changes() is running then the value returned is unpredictable and not meaningful.
I'm not sure how rowcount is set, so when Worker goes to update a work item as being taken by it, it assumes that of two concurrent executions of:
UPDATE uploaded SET state=1 WHERE state=0 AND id=1;
COMMIT;
after the commit, one cursor will have rowcount=1 and one will have rowcount=0. However, this may not be true, but I'm not sure how to correctly implement a queue removal like this in SQL, or even if it's a sensible thing to try.
An alternative would be to use Python's multiprocessing.Queue, but this is not particularly important while load is low...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: