Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

do not rely on relative eth numbering for docker connection add/remove #30

Open
simmhan opened this issue Jun 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

do not rely on relative eth numbering for docker connection add/remove #30

simmhan opened this issue Jun 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Hard These issues can be fixed but takes substantial amount of effort. high high priority
Milestone
v1.1

Comments

@simmhan
Copy link
Contributor

simmhan commented Jun 12, 2018

No description provided.

@simmhan simmhan added the low low priority label Jun 12, 2018
@simmhan simmhan added this to the v1.1 milestone Jun 12, 2018
@shreyas-badiger shreyas-badiger added Unsure One must investigate thoroughly to decide if this issue can't be resolved or not. high high priority Hard These issues can be fixed but takes substantial amount of effort. and removed Unsure One must investigate thoroughly to decide if this issue can't be resolved or not. low low priority labels Jun 15, 2018
@shreyas-badiger
Copy link
Contributor

I have marked this as high priority because this was the reason some of the connections were missing.

That was the only way I found to address the issue during initial forage. Will explore further for an alternative.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Hard These issues can be fixed but takes substantial amount of effort. high high priority
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@simmhan @shreyas-badiger