You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of 05535ee, there is a skill checkbox for the damage over time ticks dealt by guardian greatsword 5. They're not actually a lifesteal effect, but "a damaging effect with a base damage and a portion that scales off of power, which is not affected by vulnerability or outgoing damage modifiers" is essentially equivalent to the damaging portion of a lifesteal effect.
I've also heard this effect referred to as a "condition that scales off of power instead of condition damage," but that would be affected by vuln. Ticking lifesteal is closer.
Semi-confirmed by working out the binding blade damage on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUH5fAD3QU4; for some reason the wiki formula seems to come out a little higher than the ticks reported by arc, but not a lot, so, whatever. Still more accurate than it was.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of 05535ee, there is a skill checkbox for the damage over time ticks dealt by guardian greatsword 5. They're not actually a lifesteal effect, but "a damaging effect with a base damage and a portion that scales off of power, which is not affected by vulnerability or outgoing damage modifiers" is essentially equivalent to the damaging portion of a lifesteal effect.
I've also heard this effect referred to as a "condition that scales off of power instead of condition damage," but that would be affected by vuln. Ticking lifesteal is closer.
Semi-confirmed by working out the binding blade damage on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUH5fAD3QU4; for some reason the wiki formula seems to come out a little higher than the ticks reported by arc, but not a lot, so, whatever. Still more accurate than it was.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: