Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

syntax-in-paper.pdf is outdated #9

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 18, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

syntax-in-paper.pdf is outdated #9

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Mar 18, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

Robert RH reports:

On page 5 of the Syntax-in-paper.pdf  (TABLE: Estimates of fixed effects)

ALL BETAS ARE SIGNIFICANT… with the exception of MORPH which has a p  = .316, 

The Betas are as follow:
Intercept, B = 586.13,  P < .01
Priming, B = 59.55,  p < .01
Morph, B = 8.29,  p  = .316
PXM , B = 32.44,  p = .042

BUT for the DJMIXED. modelSummary, Page 8 FiXED EFFECTS TABLE


The Morph Betas has a  p value of p = .003?


the MORPH is SIGNIFICANT
ntercept, B = 586.13,  P < .01
Priming, B = 59.55,  p < .01
Morph, B = 8.29,  p  = .003
PXM , B = 32.44,  p = .042

ALSO the t-statistics on page 5 do not match the F's in on page 8 for these 
betas.. Aren't they supposed to match? Where  F = t^2?  or SQR F = t.


Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 8 May 2013 at 8:16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant