recognize misstrokes

[Monniasza]

Dictionary

I noticed these dictionary entries in:

• dict.json

Misstroked entry or entries

This looks like a misstroke or could otherwise be better:

"REBG/PHAOEUZ": "recognize",
"REBG/TPHAOEUS": "recognize",
"RERBG/TPHAOEUS": "recognize",
"REBG/TPHAOEUDZ": "recognize"
"RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS": "recognize"

This looks like a misstroke because:

• REBG/PHAOEUZ misses the T on the second stroke
• REBG/TPHAOEUS, RERBG/TPHAOEUS, and RAOEBLG"TPHAOEUS use -S instead of -Z
• RERBG/TPHAOEUS has extra -R on the first stroke
• REBG/TPHAOEUDZ has extra -D on the second stroke, so it sounds like "recognized"
• RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS has AOE instead of E and also extra -L

Expected

I would expect the outline to be:

"REZ": "recognize"

I would expect to see that outline because:

• It is a brief

Even better

To make this even better, we could:

• Remove entries completely because they can already be stroked without their own entries.

[didoesdigital]

Thanks @Monniasza ! Agreed, these can be removed.

The only one I'm not confident about changing is REBG/TPHAOEUS, RERBG/TPHAOEUS, and RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS only on the basis that they use -S instead of -Z. Two reasons I'm reluctant: 1. Because in Australian English (or UK or international English), we would use "recognise" anyway. And 2. There are a fair few other instances in the dictionary that allow either an -S or -Z ending for "-ize" endings, kind of like autocorrect so you don't have to think as hard about which one to use (because either is fine). Some examples:

"TKE/SEPBS/TAOEUS": "desensitize",
"TKE/SEPBS/TAOEUZ": "desensitize",
"STRAT/SKWRAOEUS": "strategize",
"STRAT/SKWRAOEUZ": "strategize",
"SAUBS/TKAOEUS": "subsidize",
"SAUBS/TKAOEUZ": "subsidize",
"*EPL/THAOEUS": "empathize",
"*EPL/THAOEUZ": "empathize",

I think on the balance I'm inclined to keep those. I don't think they are likely to have a huge impact on misleading beginners. I'll update the other entries when I get a moment.

[Monniasza]

RERBG/TPHAOEUS, and RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS still have different mistakes.

• RERBG/TPHAOEUS also has extra -R on the first stroke
• RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS also has AOE instead of E and also extra -L
• But REBG/TPHAOEUS has only -S instead of -Z.

[didoesdigital]

Oh right, I totally missed that the third and fourth bullets in your original post repeated outlines from the second bullet, thanks for reiterating the details!

<img width="584" alt="Bullet 1: REBG/PHAOEUZ misses the T on the second stroke. Bullet 2: REBG/TPHAOEUS, RERBG/TPHAOEUS, and RAOEBLG"TPHAOEUS use -S instead of -Z. Bullet 3: RERBG/TPHAOEUS has extra -R on the first stroke. Bullet 4: REBG/TPHAOEUDZ has extra -D on the second stroke, so it sounds like "recognized". Bullet 5: RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS has AOE instead of E and also extra -L" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9485e82e-3e88-4a6d-8b3c-c7b0a7208b6f">

I've also noted these Aussie equivalents as misstrokes:

"RAOEBLG/TPHAOEUS/A*U": "recognise",
"REBG/PHAOEUZ/A*U": "recognise",
"REBG/TPHAOEUDZ/A*U": "recognise",
"RERBG/TPHAOEUS/A*U": "recognise",

The changes are now live! Thanks @Monniasza !