You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think if we know pool addresses we can simply treat transactions that transfer coins from a pool address to one of the receiving addresses a user has AS a "mining" payout. Then there would be no need to modify any pools to get basic stats for users. Look into this.
One example is for 'pdpd', who's receiving address is dy1qfpmnqncx6m8zm3uwd3vkuxay4mpp9aswjhhm3s from pool1.
I should test this locally first and verify with some people that the numbers line up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think if we know pool addresses we can simply treat transactions that transfer coins from a pool address to one of the receiving addresses a user has AS a "mining" payout. Then there would be no need to modify any pools to get basic stats for users. Look into this.
One example is for 'pdpd', who's receiving address is dy1qfpmnqncx6m8zm3uwd3vkuxay4mpp9aswjhhm3s from pool1.
I should test this locally first and verify with some people that the numbers line up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: