You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In sententional negation, choose simple, pick "Adverb like particle" and associated questions/orth
Then switch to bipartite and fill out this information. You will see that the orth from the simple shows up here. Change the orth to something unique.
If you go back to simple, the orth has been overwritten.
I'm not sure exactly where the problem is here, but it is obvious that the values between simple and bipartite (or otherwise) should be mutually exclusive so that in the future, both construction types can co-exist without overwriting. I think it is mostly a UI issue (causing the user to update the orth) but I'm not sure of the downstream effects of them sharing a comp-neg-orth value in the choices file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To reproduce:
I'm not sure exactly where the problem is here, but it is obvious that the values between simple and bipartite (or otherwise) should be mutually exclusive so that in the future, both construction types can co-exist without overwriting. I think it is mostly a UI issue (causing the user to update the orth) but I'm not sure of the downstream effects of them sharing a comp-neg-orth value in the choices file
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: