From 7b996183f12534ad39b6626c5bc8dcbf77ebdfe8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Deepak Jois Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:33:48 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Obsidian Sync 2024-10-29 13:33:48 --- content/daily-notes/2024-10-29.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/daily-notes/2024-10-29.md b/content/daily-notes/2024-10-29.md index 0402aa3a..4143b7e3 100644 --- a/content/daily-notes/2024-10-29.md +++ b/content/daily-notes/2024-10-29.md @@ -8,4 +8,4 @@ This article makes some good relevant points. Also read the [HN discussion](http > Whether I'll be using Cursor in a few years or have moved on to another tool, I can't really tell. I am confident that at the time of writing this, Cursor is the best example of the potential of LLM coding assistants, and if you want to explore how this type of tool might be of value I suggest you give it a spin. -I found that I don't use the tab completion as much as the `Cmd-K` inline editing and `Cmd-L` chat features. However, on the rare occasion I did use it, it was pretty helpful to avoid a lot of manual typing. The other thing I believe folks are mi +I found that I don't use the tab completion as much as the `Cmd-K` inline editing and `Cmd-L` chat features. However, on the rare occasion I did use it, it was pretty helpful to avoid a lot of manual typing. The other thing I believe folks are overlooking is prompt engineering. The precision and clarity of your prompts can make a difference in the output you are getting.