You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the moment any person requesting liquidity from the LP pays a set fee regardless of the channel size. If the Decred LN and services using it really take off the demand for liquidity is bound to go up. If that happens and the liquidity providers adjust the max channel sizes users are able to request they'll have to adjust the fee sizes in order to compensate for the lockup of larger and larger sums of DCR, but without tiered fees a person requesting 0.1 DCR will have to pay the same (higher) fee as a person requesting 10 DCR or 50 DCR.
I'm wondering if tiered fees are a viable solution (in terms of implementation) or if there's already a solution being cooked up to account for a possible scenario like the one above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At the moment any person requesting liquidity from the LP pays a set fee regardless of the channel size. If the Decred LN and services using it really take off the demand for liquidity is bound to go up. If that happens and the liquidity providers adjust the max channel sizes users are able to request they'll have to adjust the fee sizes in order to compensate for the lockup of larger and larger sums of DCR, but without tiered fees a person requesting 0.1 DCR will have to pay the same (higher) fee as a person requesting 10 DCR or 50 DCR.
I'm wondering if tiered fees are a viable solution (in terms of implementation) or if there's already a solution being cooked up to account for a possible scenario like the one above.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: