You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Comment reads: "Recommended best practice is to use a
controlled vocabulary such as RFC 4646."
dcterms:language (ISO 15836-2 / DCMIMT 2020)
Comment: "Recommended practice is to use either a
non-literal value representing a language from a
controlled vocabulary such as ISO 639-2 or ISO 639-3,
or a literal value consisting of an IETF Best Current
Practice 47 language tag."
dc11:language (through 2019)
Comment reads: "Recommended best practice is to use a
controlled vocabulary such as RFC 4646."
dcterms:language (ISO 15836-2 / DCMIMT 2020)
Comment: "Recommended practice is to use either a
non-literal value representing a language from a
controlled vocabulary such as ISO 639-2 or ISO 639-3,
or a literal value consisting of an IETF Best Current
Practice 47 language tag."
range_includes:
Examples
https://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/iso639-2/eng
(English language in the Library of Congress vocabulary of ISO 639-2 languages)https://iso639-3.sil.org/code/eng
(English language in the SIL International vocabulary of ISO 639-3 languages)en-US
(BCP 47 tag for American English)zh-Hant-HK
(BCP 47 tag for Hong Kong Chinese in Traditional script)https://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb119308987
(English language in Rameau)CHANGING NOW (unless I hear objections!)
dc11:language (DCMIMT 2020)
Change comment as per dcterms:
PROPOSING FOR FUTURE (to be voted)
dc11:language
Declare equivalent to dcterms:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: