-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Library class is unsatisfied #7
Comments
the analysis was made with http://ore.aksw.org/ |
It's very common to conflate an organization with its seat or headquarters; eg
So I'd say that disjoint is wrong. |
Dear all, One library may have multiple locations, e.g. Library of Congress - Thomas Jefferson Building and John Adams Building. If we take a look at some Library community-related ontologies we'll find that this class is only a subclass of Organization or sometimes called Corporate Body
I hope I didn't make any mistake in SPARQL query but I found only 10**** cases where libraries are described by the means of properties where rdf:domain is dbo:Place and 2 with rdfs:domain dbo:Building***** I'm not convinced that Library class should be a subclass of Educational Institution. There are different types of libraries, some fall into educational institutions (school, university libraries) some into cultural ones (public, national libraries). Anyhow, In my opinion, all GLAM institutions should be categorized also directly under an Organisation So I think there is plenty of work to do in case of GLAM
|
And it that case it's likely there'll be 3 pages/entities. And yes, WGS (the simplest geo ontology) took the simplifying decision that |
Class Library has two super classes that are transitively disjoint
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: