You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The unit may either be specified in property definition or in property data. In latter case it would be helpful to also have a common unit in property definition and (implicit or explicit) rules for conversion (e.g. unit=km2 in property data and unit=m2 in property definition and some external rules for conversion between m2 and km2).
I see, that the property label contains "m2", so I would assume that numeric data is specified in square meters. The catch phrase here is "I would assume" - I am human, not a stupid computer system. And even I first had to do some research to figure out that the naked numbers in dbo:areaTotal were square meters.
Or did I miss something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The unit may either be specified in property definition or in property data. In latter case it would be helpful to also have a common unit in property definition and (implicit or explicit) rules for conversion (e.g. unit=km2 in property data and unit=m2 in property definition and some external rules for conversion between m2 and km2).
Example: http://dbpedia.org/ontology/areaTotal
I see, that the property label contains "m2", so I would assume that numeric data is specified in square meters. The catch phrase here is "I would assume" - I am human, not a stupid computer system. And even I first had to do some research to figure out that the naked numbers in dbo:areaTotal were square meters.
Or did I miss something?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: